DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorBattisti, Luca-
dc.contributor.authorCuomo, Federico-
dc.contributor.authorManganelli, Alessandra-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-17T13:02:22Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-17T13:02:22Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn2162-2671en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repos.hcu-hamburg.de/handle/hcu/1085-
dc.description.abstract‘Nature-based Solutions’ (NbSs) are considered key actions to address urban regeneration and foster greener cities. Such actions are based on collaborative governance arrangements, where public administration, private companies, research and citizens cooperate to test and manage innovative solutions. Reflecting a quadruple helix logic, these arrangements display different actors leading responsibility for maintenance while cultivating collaborative relations. Hence, collaborative governance arrangements can assume the shape of public-led, private-led, research-led or community-led types, addressing specific maintenance challenges. Yet, the conditions that allow different types of collaborative governance arrangements to make NbSs endure are still poorly investigated. Through an in-depth analysis of the proGIreg Urban Living Laboratory in Turin (Italy), this paper analyses different types of collaborative governance arrangements, exploring which challenges, risks and potentials characterise them. Particularly, the paper investigates conditions that make NbSs endure over time. The results outline how legitimacy, institutional leadership and administrative commitment, networking capacities, integration of resources, competencies, co-responsibility, knowledge transfer and empowerment play a pivotal role in making NbSs endure. Overall, this article contributes to contemporary research and practices on urban experimentation, NbSs and maintenance.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTerritory, Politics, Governanceen_US
dc.subjectUrban living laboratoriesen
dc.subjectquadruple helixen
dc.subjectmaintenanceen
dc.subjectTurinen
dc.subject.ddc333.7: Natürliche Ressourcen, Energie und Umwelten_US
dc.titleCollaborative governance arrangements: what makes nature-based solutions endure?en
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.diniArticle-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:1373-repos-13902-
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.publisher.doi10.1080/21622671.2024.2355317-
tuhh.publication.instituteGeschichte und Theorie der Stadten_US
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
tuhh.container.issue11en_US
tuhh.container.volume13, 2025en_US
tuhh.container.startpage1421en_US
tuhh.container.endpage1441en_US
openaire.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.creatorGNDBattisti, Luca-
item.creatorGNDCuomo, Federico-
item.creatorGNDManganelli, Alessandra-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.creatorOrcidBattisti, Luca-
item.creatorOrcidCuomo, Federico-
item.creatorOrcidManganelli, Alessandra-
crisitem.author.deptGeschichte und Theorie der Stadt-
Enthalten in der SammlungPublikationen (mit Volltext)
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenansichten

8
checked on 18.02.2026

Google ScholarTM

Prüfe

Export

Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons